I came across this clip of Gray’s anatomy via Jane Hart’s C4LPT blog. I’ve seen a few twitter channels broadcasting live surgery from the States, this piece in the Digital Journal gives links to Twitter streams at the Swedish Hospital in Seattle who tweeted a live kidney operation last year. This episode of Gray’s Anatomy has sparked off a discussion thread on Linked In and there aren’t many voices in support of it.
I can see that there could be educational value in this, but is Twitter the most appropriate tool for this? Wouldn’t a private channel be more appropriate than a public broadcast via Twitter. Whilst I think Twitter can be used in teaching I’m not sure that I’ll be pushing for it to be used to tweet live surgery.
Doctor Bailey introduces Twitter as a learning tool to broadcast surgeries over the internet. The chief on the other hand, is not very happy about the idea. At least not at first.
As part of a staff development course I’ve been doing we were encouraged to discuss a paper about computer assisted assessment and the barriers to adoption. The paper made reference to the 1997 Dearing Report into Higher Education (HE), which highlighted the need for institutions to develop information strategies, and that training and support were key to the effective use of computers and IT in HE. The Dearing Report also recommended that it should become the norm for all new full-time teaching staff to undergo training in teaching in higher education on accredited programmes. Universities were also encouraged to review and update their staff development programmes. Reflecting on this I included this in one of the comments I posted to the discussion,
Whilst lecturers as a group stay up to date in subjects they teach and practise in do they stay up to date with advances in teaching and learning? Do we just complete the LTA course because that’s the hoop we have to complete or do we stay engaged with learning, teaching and assessment? There are optional staff development sessions, but should there be compulsory CPD/staff development sessions in the way that doctors, dentists, lawyers etc need to do CPD to keep practising. I can imagine that many would think this is a completely outrageous suggestion!
Is this outrageous? What do you think? I did get some support for this suggestion of compulsory CPD for teaching staff, including from a colleague in the medical school, who also commented that there was an assumption that doctors can suddenly become good teachers.
Having had this discussion a tweet from Rod Lucier (@thecleversheep) on Twitter last week caught my attention.
Back in July Steve Wheeler posted a tweet asking, what is the most important issue in e-learning? Sarah Horrigan said ‘one of the most important issues in e-learning is the gap between innovators & lack of real engagement by the majority’. This was a view which I supported and I also argued for more staff development to help lessen the gap. Is this gap as Rod proposes, increasing or are the majority catching up?
The JISC report Higher Education in a Web 2.o World identified the need for targeted staff development opportunities aimed at identifying and spreading best practice in the use of Web 2.o tools in pedagogy. How do we encourage teaching staff who already feel over stretched to take part in these opportunities, particularly in areas like medicine where teachers have heavy clinical commitments. Should it be compulsory?