I’ve read a few things over the past while that have got me thinking on and off about OERs and the #UKOER programme and particularly about it’s impact and contribution to the area of online learning in medicine and other subject disciplines. I’m not sure exactly how much has been invested in the various phases of the UKOER project, this piece on the Glasgow Caledonian website indicates tens of millions, how many tens though? £50, £60 million … or more?. I asked on Twitter if anyone knew and David Kernohan replied
David Kernohan (@dkernohan) November 21, 2012
So maybe not as much as I was beginning to think, but I’m still interested to know whether this has been a worthwhile investment, has it been value for money and what’s been the impact on the academic community and what’s the level of awareness and engagement like amongst staff in HE? What will the longer term impact be?
It was interesting to see Simon Thomson’s (@digisim) Storify of the recent UKOER12 event, where he says
After being involved in a phase one project (where I was very much heavily involved in OER networks) I am now more aware that beyond the ukoer network the volume at which OER is heard is significantly lower.
I think Simon is right and wonder if in some places the volume is actually off and it’s never been turned on. Simon asks if the OER community has failed in some way to evangelise beyond its borders. Maybe it has been too inward looking, with the same old crowd following the circuit of OER meetings. How effective has the communication and dissemination of UKOER activities been? In the words of Spandau Ballet has it been a case of ‘Communication let me down’! Those of us engaged online via twitter and blogs can follow what’s going on to some degree but even then trying to keep up with all the projects large and small seems like a full time job in itself. But what about those who aren’t engaged online and aren’t part of online networks, what’s the strategy to get these academics thinking about OERs. Now the funding has come to an end what’s going to be long term legacy, what are the sustainability issues and what do we do to try and raise the profile of OERs?
Is the communication issue outside the OER network the only thing that’s affected the volume? Has UKOER met the needs of academics at the digital chalkface ie resources that can be reused in multiple different contexts? Is there lots of high quality content that academics want to use and assimilate into their teaching? If there was wouldn’t we all be talking about it and generating a lot of noise?
Despite dipping in and out of Jorum and subscribing to the RSS feed for new resources I’ve yet to reuse anything because I’ve not seen anything that meets my needs. Consequently it’s somewhere I rarely bother to look.
The big issue in developing online resources in medical education that I see, day in and day, out is the need for reusable illustrations, animations and videos. These are the types of OERS that we’re always on the look out for. Along with other members of the team I work in, I’m frequently presented with storyboards for online resources full of medical illustrations etc taken from a Google image search. Clinicians are often a bit taken aback when we say we can’t use them because they’re copyrighted and then when we run an advanced search they look crest fallen as invariably what comes up is nothing of any use. They’ve put time and effort into trying to source images and all to no avail! The good quality images worth using tend to come from the big textbook publishing houses and so can’t be reused to develop our own learning resources let alone new OERs. We end up scouring wikimedia commons and creative commons image banks in the hope we’ll find something we can reuse that fits the bill. For anatomy illustrations my first stop was always the Health Education Assets Library – HEAL – based in the US which has a great collection of illustrations shared by the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. The problem now is that HEAL has been down for months and who knows if it will ever come back online. I often think if only some of that UKOER money had been spent on core resources like images and animations, what sort of impact would that have made? Would we have had the beginnings of a bank of learning assets that would have been really useful and reused in medical courses and in the life sciences here in the UK and elsewhere that met an identifed need?
My philosophy is very much there’s no point in re-inventing the wheel when someone’s already done it and I’m a big supporter of OER and try to raise awareness amongst colleagues where I can. We make use of lots of OERs and we’re always on the look out for things that we can pass on to clinicians to review to see if it’s something we can reuse in local teaching and point our students to. Some of these OERS do include videos that have been funded by HEA grants like the St George’s Medical School clinical skills videos, but the vast majority of OERS we use have been sourced from YouTube, Vimeo, TED, SlideShare, iTunesU, iBooks, blogs and the like. These have typically been developed by keen and enthusiastic academics. There are also sites like GetBodySmart developed over a number of years as a labour of love by Scott Sheffield and probably used by medical students the world over. We’ve also seen our own students developing OERs and students elsewhere have done similarly. These are the sorts of resources that we can use to build and create our own teaching narratives and learning activities and present them in the context of our own curriculum and reuse in different ways in a range of learning resources.
So as the UKOER round of projects comes to a close I’m left thinking what’s the impact been in different subject disciplines? What do others involved in medical education think? There have been some projects that seem to have become well established such as HumBox. What’s the general level of awareness of these subject specific OER repositories and how many resources are actually being reused? And what about Jorum, the national UKOER learning repository, whilst well known in some circles I still come across many colleagues who’ve never heard of it (something I’ve mentioned before) and that’s with my institution having signed up to it before the days of OER funded projects!
I had high expectations at start of the UKOER journey and now I feel a bit disappointed. Is the issue me, lack of engagement on my part, or am I just missing something? I feel I’ve had the volume turned up but I know so many who haven’t heard the message. More fundamentally I wonder whether the UKOER initiative has encouraged UK universities to promote and support the development of OERs and so build and sustain a community of sharing? I’m not even aware if there are colleagues locally in other Schools who’ve been involved in any UKOER projects. I wonder too what those involved in the UKOER inner circle would do differently if they had the chance to run the programme again? As usual lots of questions!
Image by btrautweinjr